Sarah Media

TEDx – What You Weren’t Taught About Making Money What if making money was just like riding a bike? Where you get better the more you practise the skill. While you may be familiar with money preserving skills like ‘save more’ or ‘spend less’, Sarah Potter explores the myths and realities of what it is really like to build the skills to make more money, grow wealth and investing in the markets for average people.

Find out why financial literacy is failing you, and how to change the financial narrative for the next generation. As companies, Google  and Yahoo  are tech firms that represent more than just search engines. Both have built household brands; Google has even influenced our everyday language, making “googling” a verb. We have become dependent on tools from both of these huge search engines, and many investors may believe that either of these two companies would be a wise investment. However, from a trader’s point of view, looking deeper at both the fundamental and technical showings for both stocks, I believe that one is a much better option to include in a portfolio in the short term.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders isn't a big fan of the media.

In her post “,” Kemberlee laid out the latest White House drama that has at the thought of managing to undo the 2016 election. The drama started, as Kemberlee wrote, with an “article published in The Guardian Wednesday lifted passages from a new book ‘Fire and Fury’ by Michael Wolff.

Sarah meditation

Bannon was quoted heavily in the book, calling the infamous Trump Tower meeting with Russians ‘treasonous’.” One star of this latest batch of leftist hysteria has been White House press secretary Sarah Sanders. She’s been a joy to watch as she swats back panting media types who are eager to see our president destroyed. Including by largely written by a pro-Hillary, anti-Trump hack. Here is the president’s statement on the allegations reportedly made in the Woolff book. Trump totally torches Bannon: “When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind.” Full statement: — Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) Following and in no particular order are some of Sanders’ best moments over the past week. Mentally Unstable?

I’ll give you mentally unstable In the wake of the buzz surrounding the president’s fitness for office, Sanders flips the script. Asked about what Trump thinks about people questioning his mental fitness, Sanders says, 'What I think is really mentally unstable is people that don't see the positive impact that this president is having on the country.' — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) Trump’s base not affected by Trump-Bannon rift At a White House presser, Sanders responds to journalist questions about the possibility of the Trump-Bannon split affecting Trump’s base and its support for the president. Sanders points out that President Trump was the one elected to office and that his base supports the agenda on which he campaigned. Watch: Sad, pathetic tabloid gossip At another White House presser, Sanders points out that one of the obvious lies reportedly in the book is that the president did not know who John Boehner is. As she notes, there are photos of the president and Boehner playing golf and the claim is “pretty ridiculous.” She also says that she won’t go through the book page by page refuting “tabloid gossip” because it’s just “sad and pathetic.” Watch: Maybe Breitbart should think about parting ways with Bannon At this same press conference, a reporter asks if Breitbart should part ways with Bannon.

Sanders says it’s something that they should consider. Given that Bannon is as a, it’s hard to see how they don’t at least consider parting ways with him. Bannon used Breitbart to flirt with the alt-right in the same manner that Trump was equinanimous regarding Charlottesville. It is no surprise that decades of Democrat race-baiting has elevated identity group politics in America. What they were surprised about (but shouldn’t have been) is that a reactionary movement decided to use the same rationale to promote white identity politics. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the alt-right are neo-nazis, just that they are tired of being society’s whipping boys.

There’s nothing shocking or even untoward about that. They have legitimate grievances and are entitled to representation. Bannon flirted with them to get their votes (WHICH WORKED), then toned it down after the election was over. I never saw Trump or Bannon promote “racial purity” as a thing. There were no swastikas flying at the white house.

Okay, Fine, I’ll do my best for you. It does seem that alt-right is like pretty much every other political label and hard to find consensus on. For example, when I think “conservative,” the last thing I think is raving, violent antifa types who despise McConnell at least as much as Bannon does.

As a conservative, I have a very clear picture of what “conservatism” is and what it means in terms of government, and what I read in LI comments about conservatives is so wildly off-base that the dripping condescension and disgust surrounding those who snarl about conservatives is startling. That said, even amongst recognizable conservatives there is disagreement about what conservatism means.

The same is true of the “alt-right” (and of “liberal” and “libertarian” and “progressive,” etc.), but what I meant was the fringe alt-right of the alt-net who crawled out of the bowels of the internet at Bannon’s behest and found a home on Breitbart. A lot of Andrew-era conservatives left Breitbart as a result of this shift because the alt-right have particularly unsavory beliefs that don’t mesh with conservatives. For example, they are often anti-Semitic, are wild-eyed conspiracy nuts who drool over every lunatic utterance of Alex Jones and his ilk, are actual white supremacists (and like all actual racists are happy to tell you all about it and brag about their hate), are deeply disdainful of conservatives, are always agitating for violence (much like the antifa, with the stated purpose of “saving” America with some insane “civil war”), and are rabidly nationalistic (not patriotic, not “America first, actual Nazi-style superior race nationalistic).

Indeed, at one point when Milo was still there, and I quote: “There are many things that separate the alternative right from old-school racist skinheads (to whom they are often idiotically compared), but one thing stands out above all else: intelligence.” Ah, so the new-school racist skinheads are smarter? /smh Ultimately, then, the alt-right were banished decades ago to the fringes for good reason, and Bannon dragged them out into the light of day and gave them a voice on Breitbart (read Milo’s article linked above, it’s a war-cry against conservatives). Actually, some time ago. As to Bannon being a conservative, he most assuredly is not. Indeed, he is in 2016: “I’m a Leninist.” I guess I don’t have to tell you that there is nothing Leninist about American conservatives, on that conservatives agree. Bannon, however, likely does see himself as a Leninist, thus the second part of may statement about him being a progressive. He’s a progressive in the sense that progressives were progressive in the ’30’s, salivating over Hitler and Mussolini, supporting both Nazism and fascism.

Not that different than progressives today, come to think of it. For Bannon, this Leninism, or whatever you want to call it (I call it progressivism) takes the form of an oppressive, vengeful government attacking (punishing?) enemies and rewarding friends. It takes the form of inventing enemies who need to be defeated (conservatives first, then the GOP establishment, though he didn’t originally make any distinction between the two.

Sarah Medical

He just changed his language to appear to be going after RINO-types only). And it takes the form of his statement that he wants “everything to come crashing down” and to “ government.” “Deconstruct” is an interesting choice here, by the way, illustrating as it does that he means the same thing but has attempted to recast it in less-alienating terms.

Punto de vista definicion. Las preferencias por quien las consumen siempre va ser la misma y ese es su medicina por mas cosas y reabilitaciones que haga haga un drogadicto la enfermedad va seguir hay con el.

My Top 5 Twitter Tips

Well, less alienating to anyone who has no idea who Derrida was or what deconstruction means. Anyway, you asked what I meant, and that’s what I meant. In short, I don’t like Bannon, never have, and I’m just fine with him being out of favor with the president.